Somebody has been sending for several weeks commercial spam with spoofed From: field in the header containing various fictitious addresses from the mkolar.org domain. I have learned about it only because some of these spoofed e-mails are being returned to mkolar.org because they are undeliverable.
NONE OF THESE ORIGINATED FROM THIS SITE!
If you ever got such an e-mail, you can verify this fact by reading carefully its full header. Here you can find out more: Reading Email Headers.
Here is a recent example of an e-mail pretending to originate from this site:
Return-Path: <oevb@mkolar.org> Received: from dsl85-106-59190.ttnet.net.tr (dsl85-106-59190.ttnet.net.tr [85.106.231.54] (may be forged)) by penrose.cs.tin.it (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id k4J9RE04007913 for <del_piero@juventus.it>; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:27:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oevb@mkolar.org) Received: from [85.106.226.151] (helo=si.bvzxya) by dsl85-106-59190.ttnet.net.tr with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fh1Je-0005ld-GY; Fri, 19 May 2006 12:30:38 +0300 Message-ID: <001901c67b26$68706dbe$97e26a55@si.bvzxya> From: "Bridget Mcginnis" <oevb@mkolar.org> To: <del_piero@juventus.it> Subject: onus max Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 12:18:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0015_01C67B3F.8DBDA566" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0015_01C67B3F.8DBDA566 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0016_01C67B3F.8DBDA57C" .......
There is no e-mail account oevb@mkolar.org.
The true origin of each e-mail gives the first in time (positioned last in the
header) Received field of the header (I marked it in red above). It says that this e-mail
was sent from IP address 85.106.226.151 which actually belongs to the
ttnet.net.tr domain in Turkey!!!
You can see that in this case a relay site in Italy (second line of the header)
correctly guessed that the header is forged (may be forged).
I found about this particular e-mail only because it's intended recipient also doesn't exist, and so the e-mail was returned to the forged Return Path in the first line of the header, accompanied with this note:
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<del_piero@juventus.it>
(reason: 550 5.0.0 <del_piero@juventus.it>... No such user here)
May 19, 2006, mk